A recent study has revealed alarming geographic biases in the research and tracking of aquatic animals. The findings indicate that a staggering 95% of studies are conducted in wealthy, English-speaking countries that have high levels of conservation funding.
This trend raises concerns about the representation of biodiversity hotspots, which are often located in less stable regions that may not receive the same level of research attention or funding.
Researchers are calling for a more equitable approach to studying aquatic biodiversity, emphasizing the need for increased investment in research within these critical areas.